> Sorry to waste your time on this. Don't worry, I like investigating this stuff. I don't like the rule-lawyering that usually follows ;-)
> I'm glad it states the for-loop variable will be left undefined - that's > good enough documentation for me. It is *not* undefined when the loop is left with break or exit, that's the point. The ISO is not a very good reference for modern-ish Pascal. -- Regards, Martok _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
