Michael Van Canneyt <mich...@freepascal.org> schrieb am Do., 25. Okt. 2018, 14:55:
> > > On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote: > > > > >> Personally I am also in favour of a more open technique instead of a > >> technique which is proprietary to a platform, and in this sense I > >> understand > >> and endorse your point of view, but beggars can't be choosers. > >> > >> There is no problem to have both techniques available. As I wrote, the > SEH > >> is the fastest path. > >> > > > > I have my doubts especially as the rtlunwind stuff of Kylix only works on > > i386. The SEH mechanism between i386 and all other Windows platforms > > differs significantly and I doubt that Simon only wants i386 to benefit. > > If 'SEH is the fastest path.' is not correct, then all the more reason to > use DWARF... > A further obstacle for SEH on non-i386: GNU AS supports the pseudo instructions needed for SEH only for PE/COFF, but not ELF. This would mean that we'd need to add them manually to to the assembly files which would definitely be more bothersome... Regards, Sven >
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
