Am Fr., 15. Feb. 2019, 10:07 hat James via fpc-devel < fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org> geschrieben:
> I'm interested in starting (or joining) a discussion on the next (*non* > backwards compatible) version of FPC. Instead of being classically object > oriented, there is merit in examining a model with ad-hoc polymorphism like > Rust. > A non backwards compatible version of FPC would not be FPC. If you want to discuss singular extensions of the language (in a backwards compatible way that respects the spirit of the existing language) that can be done, but I highly doubt that a complete remodelling of the language just to satisfy the next hype language is in the interest of the other core devs (it definitely isn't in mine). Regards, Sven
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
