It's not DFA. See my proposal thread from January and Jonas' implementation from this week:
<http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-devel/2019-January/039972.html> <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-devel/2019-May/040737.html> > Warnings should indicate the possibility of unstable code due to > uninitialised values As long as the core question remains unanswered, these are required exactly because in cases (pun intended) where they exist, the compiler may do something very different from what was intended, and even be wildly different between platforms. I would prefer literally any other solution (such as the two-line-patch my Windows trunk builds have contained for two years now), but this is the one that gets merged. Go figure. -- Regards, Martok Ceterum censeo b32079 esse sanandam. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
