On 30/12/2021 20:55, Martin Frb via fpc-devel wrote:
On 30/12/2021 20:46, Jonas Maebe via fpc-devel wrote:
On 30/12/2021 18:06, Florian Klämpfl via fpc-devel wrote:
Ah yes, or like this. Nevertheless, the question is whether the ldrsb
w0,[x0] is correct or not.
Yes, I was unclear: with the "I don't know/remember where this is
done" I meant "changing the load of the unsigned byte type into a
signed load". I can't think immediately of a reason either why this is
done.
"unsigned byte"? The pointer in the pascal code is a pint8 => signed.
Oh, I thought it was puint8. Then it makes sense.
c90616944d3bde7b36e924d27a0790195d61f95c applies both to OS_8 and OS_S8.
Jonas
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
