On 04-05-12 14:53, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
On 04-05-12 14:31, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
...
Compared to the other variants (e.g. with the multiplies, except for the
table lookup) you already save a lot of cycles - although I guess they
would be sufficiently fast anyway, considering the typical uart speeds.
Thomas
Hi Thomas,
My processor flags : -Wpstm32f103rb -Cparmv7m.
The #23 is no typo, I need to reverse 9 bits. I'm using 9 bit
synchronous transmission. My first usart-tests were at 4Mbps. The person
that made the driver recommends max. 6Mbps.
Hi,
I tested some things this weekend. Strange things happen ;-)
The code does not work. Trying to debug with gdb, around the code I got
an error, something like 'recovering from a double fault'.
After searching the STM32 forum of ST I found that some toolchains
assemble the rbit instruction in a wrong way. Someone made a work-around :
.word 0xFxAyFA9y //RBIT Rx,Ry x, y = 0 to F
My Freepascal version is this :
.word 0xFA90
.word 0xF0A0
Then when I disassemble in gdb, I get rbit r0,r0
Disassembling with objdump gives a strange result.
I'm going to try this as soon as I can.
Regards,
Koenraad Lelong.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
