From: ew...@yellowcouch.org Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 21:25:27 +0100 To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] windows.GetProcAddress() vs DynLibs.GetProcAddress()
On 13 Jan 2014, at 17:33, Fred van Stappen wrote:Hello and many thanks to help. Here demo to show the problem (i hope). >> https://sites.google.com/site/fiensprototyping/dynlib_vs_windows.zip in the dynlibs version, why do you use `PChar(1)` or `PChar(2)` [or ....] instead of the name of the function as the second argument in GetProcAddress()? Perhaps try `GetProcAddress(LibHandle, 'soundtouch_clear');` on line 54 and modify the rest in a similar fashion? Hope it helps.--Ewald _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal Yep Ewald, many thank to help us ( and me). The SoundTouch.dll uses index to call the procedures. Like that : [Ordinal/Name Pointer] [ 0] soundtouch_clear [ 1] soundtouch_createInstance [ 2] soundtouch_destroyInstance >> try `GetProcAddress(LibHandle, 'soundtouch_clear'); I have try that, but it does not work...`
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
