> I just tried this really quick and it doesn’t seem to work with records but if I changed it to a class that worked.
Just as you can't declare next field to be a record when learning linked list (well, we normally learned that some time in the past), the solution is just the same here: declare and use pointer to the record instead. Using classes, however, the pointer can be abstracted and you will have less messy code. -- View this message in context: http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/For-in-enumerator-for-generic-records-tp5726980p5726995.html Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
