On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 11:34:33 +0000 Mark Morgan Lloyd <markmll.fpc-pas...@telemetry.co.uk> wrote:
> On 02/06/18 13:00, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > >> Sven Barth via fpc-pascal <fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> hat am 2. Juni > >> 2018 um 09:42 geschrieben: > > denisgolovan < denisgolo...@yandex.ru> > >> schrieb am Sa., 2. Juni 2018, 09:18: > > @Sven > > Please reconsider "+" > >> operator for arrays if your changes really forbid to overload operators > >> for arrays now.> > > It wasn't me who implemented that part. I personally > >> had planned to do it with a warning for existing overloads, but Florian > >> beat me to it and implemented it this way. Though when asked by me he did > >> say that we'll wait and see if people complain... So *maybe* we'll change > >> this. > > > +1 for the possibility to overload this operator. > > It would be reasonable to assume that the predefined + might be > substantially more efficient than a programmer-defined one could be. Yes, that's one of the reasons I vote for keeping the new feature and allow to overload the operator. Mattias _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
