On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 12:19 PM Noel Duffy via fpc-pascal < fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
> So I guess the question is, is it worth the effort to make > StrToHostAddr6 RFC4291 compliant? Is that something the FPC team would > want, or do they just not use the sockets unit? > There have been 2 changes applied to sockets.inc in the last two months so it is not neglected. I am convinced a patch to ensure compliance will be considered for inclusion, especially if you provide test cases demonstrating shortcomings in the current implementation.
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
