> On May 14, 2022, at 4:04 PM, Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal 
> <fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
> 
> No, because most modern OSes don't allow you to address memory below the 
> stack pointer (and for the ones that do to a limited extent, the compiler 
> could be using that memory already).

I thought the stack had a fixed size of memory that’s in every frame and it’s 
just a matter of if it’s occupied by any local variables or not. Seems 
conceptually simple to advance the pointer as if a local variable was declared 
but maybe this needs to happen at compile time making alloca more of a compiler 
intrinsic.

Regards,
        Ryan Joseph

_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply via email to