Hi Mathieu, As far as I know, attachments are not allowed in this mailing list. However, your attachment could not answer questions like these: o Which graphic format do you use in FrameMaker? o Are the graphics referenced? o What is the content of the anchored frames with the graphics? Only a single graphics files or several graphics files or also any FrameMaker graphics object? o Do all converted graphics files have a bad quality or only specific ones? If not all, what are the differences? o Which graphics settings in the ini file did you test with which result? o Do you use the latest Mif2Go update?
I do not know, whether I can help you. However, these answers will help to find an answer. Best regards Winfried > -----Original Message----- > From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com > [mailto:framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of > mathieu jacquet > Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 10:50 AM > To: framers at lists.frameusers.com > Subject: Graphics quality - Mif2Go > > > Dear all, > > we are generating EclipseHelp and OmniHelp for our > documentation and chose Mif2Go. Everything runs perfect > except on one point: after conversion, graphics are there, > well layed out but of terrible quality. I attach an original > picture and its generated counterpart. We've played with > GraphicExportDPI and GraphicExportFormat but to no avail so far. > > Do you have any strategy for obtaining graphics of a decent > quality in our HTML output? I guess it is something to be > thought about from scratch, when importing them in Frame. Is > there any rule to respect (for instance, import in xx DPI in > Frame, then set GraphicExportDPI to xx DPI)? > > Thank you very much in anticipation, > Mathieu. > > P.S.: work environment is FM9 on Vista 64. > > _________________________________________________________________ > Hotmail et MSN dans la poche? HOTMAIL et MSN sont dispo > gratuitement sur votre t?l?phone! > http://www.messengersurvotremobile.com/?d=Hotmail