> "Jacques A. Vidrine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Will we always have this dichotomy between kblah/k5blah utilities? It is
> > fairly annoying. Anecdotally, there don't seem to be many new Kerberos
> > IV installations, & Kerberos V's utilities can get/list/trash version 4
> > & 5 tickets.
>
> Yes. My current plan of things to happen (in -current and after 4.3)
> is to ditch the v4 programs basically and install the v5 ones under
> the canonical names (with v4-compatibility if compiled in). And to
> always build and install the krb5 programs/libraries, but ifdef'ing
> the support in other programs. How does that sounds?
Wonderful!
If you need repo-copying done, I'm your man!
--
Mark Murray
Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
