[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Yes, there is no possibility of ULE 2.0 being merged to 6.x. Use it in
6.x if you dare, just don't complain to us if it breaks your system :-)
All right, I won't :-)
i.e. if at any point you start experiencing problems, do not report them
until you have verified that they persist with 4BSD also.
I can hear you.
Then again, I'm in the slow process of converting people in my office to use
FreeBSD instead of GNU/Linux: it's not going to be easy if 6.3 4BSD exhibits
slownesses when compiling a kernel, and 6.3 ULE might prove not that stable :-\
(I've not encountered any problem until now, though, and I'm "touching wood" as
my granny says)
By the way, why still include ULE in 6.x if it is to be avoided ?
Typically we don't remove even experimental (even broken) code in stable
branches in case it is still useful to someone despite the problems.
Try 7.0 instead.
Kris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
