23.06.2020 2:26, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >> 22.06.2020 19:49, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >>> Whats unmaintained about code that has no need to change cause it just >>> pretty much works? >> Have you actually tried running routed(8) as base for real network with >> loops, >> mix of p2p and ethernet-like interfaces, IPv4 aliases, need of offset-lists >> and >> with diameter about 6 hops? > > As I said I know of people that are running and it is working, and > Hiroko's post clearly establishes that as fact in evidence. > > I am not even sure that RIP* has loop detection in the protocol,
It has, of course. > as the prefered routing protocol for anything multipath (which > is what loops are in effect) is OSPF. RIPv2 may be used for failover, not for multipath. Any redundant route creates L3 "multipath". >> I'm not talking about RIPv2 inherent deficiencies. >> Our routed just glitches where quagga's ripd just works. > > And your PR# for reporting the bug is? Was. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51927 Never had a chance to verify if it was really fixed in HEAD because it was not for RELENG_4, so I moved to ripd. As you may remeber, RELENG_5 needed much time to become ready for production. _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"