Hello, > Heh. I was just starting to look at writing a pgpool-II-33 port, but it > seems you have beaten me to it.
Well, and you provided a thorough review, thanks for that! Now, who's in charge to merge all your recommendations ? Michelle ? > >>> Second step: merging the diverse set of pgpool related ports into one ? > > > >> Maybe pg-pool-II and pg-pool-devel...? (3.1/2 in stable and 3.3 in > >> devel - until it changes?) > > pgpool-II has 3 stable releases at the moment 3.1.10, 3.2.8, 3.3.3 > which are all still receiving updates. Do you think that all three are still used by the ports users community ? > > I assume that all the pgpool ports can be consolidated into one (3.3). > > Maybe if we start by DEPRECATing the old ones to find out who > > still wants them ? Bcc to kuriyama... > There's a number of things wrong with this port, some inherited from the > pgpool-II port you copied, and some where you're using outmoded constructs. [lots of good hints] -- p...@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go ! _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"