On 2020-04-18 17:23, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 18.04.20 um 18:40 schrieb D'Arcy Cain: >> On 2020-04-18 10:18, ajtiM via freebsd-ports wrote: >>> BTW, I do not know why some apps need llvm60 still: >> I really wish there was only one llvm. It's one of those things that >> can take days to build. A minor upgrade can trigger multiple rebuilds. >> In my case only llvm80 and llvm90 but still. > In my experience, LLVM responds rather well to ccache installed. It can > occasionally get slow, but if it's just about a single file, ccache > helps massively. GCC benefits less (if at all) from ccache.
One of us may be misunderstanding the other. Compiling with llvm can be slow but I was talking about the time it takes to build llvm itself. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <da...@druid.net> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 788 2246 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner. IM: da...@vybenetworks.com, VoIP: sip:da...@druid.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature