Sasa
--On 18. december 2005 14:02 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In looking at this again, I didn't realize you were pinging from Win2K Win2K uses the -f option to set the Do Not Fragment bit, UNIX uses the -f option to flood ping. Win2k ping does not have a flood ping option. You can download a ping for Windows from Microsoft here: http://research.microsoft.com/barc/mbone/mping.aspx that does have an option for flooding traffic. ( set the milliseconds between packets very low) but I have not tested it. Doubtless others are available on the Internet. Ted-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sasa Stupar Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 6:07 AM To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme Song) Nothing. From the GUI view it is at 0% of utilisation. Sasa --On 18. december 2005 3:51 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:what does the CPU of the router do when your doing that? Ted-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sasa Stupar Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 3:00 AM To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme Song) --On 18. december 2005 2:32 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf OfSasa StuparSent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 2:21 AM To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme Song) --On 18. december 2005 1:33 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:-----Original Message----- From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 5:25 AM To: Ted Mittelstaedt; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Drew Tomlinson Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme Song) --On 16. december 2005 3:36 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:-----Original Message----- From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 12:34 AM To: Ted Mittelstaedt; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Drew Tomlinson Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme Song)TedHmmm, here is test with iperf what I have done with andwithout polling:************** ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ [1816] local 192.168.10.249 port 1088 connected with 192.168.1.200 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [1816] 0.0-10.0 sec 108 MBytes 90.1 Mbits/sec This is when I use Device polling option on m0n0. If I disable this option then my transfer is worse: ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ [1816] local 192.168.10.249 port 1086 connected with 192.168.1.200 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [1816] 0.0-10.0 sec 69.7 MBytes 58.4 Mbits/sec *************** BTW: my router is m0n0wall (FBSD 4.11).what are the cpu speeds and operating systems of all devices in the packet path, what is the make and model of switchs in use, provide dmesg output of the bsd box, a network diagram of the setup, etc. etc. etc. The above test results are not replicatable and thus, worthless. Useful test results would allow a reader to build an exact duplicate of your setup, config it identically, and getidenticalresults. TedOK. The server (192.168.1.200) is FreeBSD 5.4 with Duron 900and 3C905CThe 3com 3c905 is not a very good card under FreeBSD thedriver waswritten without support from 3com and is shakey on a lot ofhardware. I wouldsay there's a big question that your server is actually saturating the ethernet. Probably that is why your only getting 90Mbt.NIC; router is m0n0wall (FreeBSD 4.11) with three Intel Pro/100S Nics and Celeron 433; The user computer (192.168.10.249) is Celeron 2400 with winxp and integrated NIC Realtek 8139 series. Switch is CNET CNSH-1600.Once again, the winxp+realtek 8139 is not a particularlysteller combo,I would question that this system could saturate theethernet, either.Diagram: <http://me.homelinux.net/network.pdf> dmesg from the router: ---------------- $ dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991,1992, 1993, 1994The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p11 #0: Wed Sep 7 13:49:09 CEST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/M0N0WALL_GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (434.32-MHz686-class CPU)Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x665 Stepping = 5 Features=0x183f9ff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,SEP,MTRR,P GE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR> real memory = 201326592 (196608K bytes) avail memory = 179142656 (174944K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc1006000. Preloaded mfs_root "/mfsroot" at 0xc100609c. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Preloaded image </mfsroot> 11534336 bytes at 0xc0504d9c md1: Malloc disk Using $PIR table, 8 entries at 0xc00fdef0 npx0: <math processor> on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: <Intel 82443BX (440 BX) host to PCI bridge> on motherboard pci0: <PCI bus> on pcib0 pcib1: <Intel 82443BX (440 BX) PCI-PCI (AGP) bridge> at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: <PCI bus> on pcib1 isab0: <Intel 82371AB PCI to ISA bridge> at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: <ISA bus> on isab0 atapci0: <Intel PIIX4 ATA33 controller> port 0xf000-0xf00f at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 uhci0: <Intel 82371AB/EB (PIIX4) USB controller> port 0xd000-0xd01f irq 11 at device 7.2 on pci0 usb0: <Intel 82371AB/EB (PIIX4) USB controller> on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered chip1: <Intel 82371AB Power management controller> port 0x5000-0x500f at device 7.3 on pci0 pci0: <unknown card> (vendor=0x1274, dev=0x1371) at 8.0 irq 11 fxp0: <Intel 82550 Pro/100 Ethernet> port 0xd800-0xd83f mem 0xd0400000-0xd041ffff,0xd0460000-0xd0460fff irq 10 at device 15.0 on pci0 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:62:f6:06 inphy0: <i82555 10/100 media interface> on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto fxp1: <Intel 82550 Pro/100 Ethernet> port 0xdc00-0xdc3f mem 0xd0420000-0xd043ffff,0xd0462000-0xd0462fff irq 12 at device 16.0 on pci0 fxp1: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:9c:2a:16 inphy1: <i82555 10/100 media interface> on miibus1 inphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto fxp2: <Intel 82550 Pro/100 Ethernet> port 0xe000-0xe03f mem 0xd0440000-0xd045ffff,0xd0461000-0xd0461fff irq 7 at device19.0 on pci0fxp2: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:8c:e4:f6 inphy2: <i82555 10/100 media interface> on miibus2 inphy2: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto pmtimer0 on isa0 fdc0: <NEC 72065B or clone> at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: <Keyboard controller (i8042)> at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A, console sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 BRIDGE 020214 loaded IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing. IP Filter: v3.4.35 initialized. Default = block all,Logging = enabledad0: 3098MB <WDC AC33200L> [6296/16/63] at ata0-master PIO4 acd0: CDROM <LITE-ON CD-ROM LTN-527T> at ata1-master PIO4 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/md0c fxp1: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 fxp0: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 fxp2: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 ata0: resetting devices .. done ------------- If you need more just ask for it. You don't need to beangry. Peace.OK, next question: ftp transfer like this uses large packets, rerun the testwith ping -fwith different ping packet sizes, post the results. Remember, routers have to deal with many sized packets. TedInteresting. I have tested like you've said and I could ping with packet size 1450 bytes. Everything bigger is telling that "packet must be fragmented but DF is set up". This is of course pingingfrom winxp toserver.That is normal since under winxp ping sets the DF bit I believe. The larger packets are not what matters, the smallerpackets are moreinteresting. I find it hard to believe your getting the samethroughputwith flood pinging with 56 byte packets. TedHere is the output: ------------- C:\Documents and Settings\nathsasa>ping -t -f -l 56 mig29 Preverjanje dosegljivosti mig29.workgroup [192.168.1.200] z56 B podatkOdgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 Statistika preverjanja dosegljivosti za 192.168.1.200: Paketov: Poslanih = 46, Prejetih = 46, Izgubljenih = 0(0% izguba),Povpreèni èas v milisekundah: Minimum = 0ms, Maksimum = 0ms, Povpreèje = 0ms ----------- It's in my native language but the position is the same asin english.-- Sasa Stupar _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.1/206 - Release Date: 12/16/2005-- Sasa Stupar _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.1/206 - Release Date: 12/16/2005
-- Sasa Stupar _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
