On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 22:49 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >> is used)? what is more stupid? whould we vote? > > > > That was my whole point of showing you the low usage. I take that as a > > yes, RAID 1+0 would provide a dramatic difference in speed, thanks! > > the only adventage of RAID-5 is less "wasted" space than RAID-1. one and > the only adventage. write performance is terrible on small writes - > exactly what happens on database usage. > > with today sizes of disks more "wasted" space doesn't make much a problem, > as i don't think your database have hundreds of gigabytes. > > did you look how much disks (no matter what RAID or just devices) are > actually used?! > > use systat
Using 'systat -iostat' it shows mostly idle with 25-70 MB/s on the aacd0 array. Most of time above 50. Thanks for the help! -- Robert _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"