On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 03:41:22PM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/doc/head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/releases/12.2R/signatures.xml > > Is it plan that 12.x 13.x etc continue with > provision of sig files for BETA and RC? > If so, process can be added to releng todo docs, > and the sig asc files pushed out to website, > and to download areas (https, ftp, rsync, torrent, etc) > alongside with the image datasets themselves. > If not, the docs can make note of the labels > to which sigs apply. >
They will be added with the first RC build, after the doc tree is tagged for the final release. Since moving the release notes and other related documentation from base to doc, this introduced a bug in the order of operations I have not yet figured out how to solve the right way. In other words, adding the signed BETA* checksums to the doc tree for the 12.1-BETA* builds, turned out to be an error. (Also note, the signed checksums were not available for previous release BETA builds. And there is the PGP-signed email to stable@ that contains them.) Glen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
