Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 04:29:37PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
Here is what I'm seeing now:
last pid: 70893; load averages: 1.70, 1.10, 0.58
up 27+02:59:26 16:23:59
134 processes: 3 running, 131 sleeping
CPU: 94.8% user, 0.0% nice, 4.6% system, 0.6% interrupt, 0.0% idle
Mem: 309M Active, 48M Inact, 113M Wired, 17M Cache, 60M Buf, 3624K Free
Swap: 640M Total, 205M Used, 435M Free, 32% Inuse
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
751 pgsql 1 45 0 159M 556K select 1 249:38 0.00% postgres
756 pgsql 1 44 0 25004K 600K select 1 86:31 0.00% postgres
754 pgsql 1 44 0 159M 1040K select 1 13:02 0.00% postgres
753 pgsql 1 44 0 159M 7868K select 1 10:55 0.00% postgres
597 root 1 44 0 3184K 464K select 0 4:49 0.00% syslogd
755 pgsql 1 44 0 159M 1432K select 1 4:46 0.00% postgres
659 root 1 44 0 62156K 1356K select 1 4:30 0.00% vmware-guestd
765 nobody 1 4 0 3236K 192K kqread 1 3:25 0.00% memcached
775 root 1 44 0 9996K 340K select 1 2:18 0.00% httpd
900 sveb 1 5 0 9452K 0K select 0 1:49 0.00% <sshd>
790 www 1 44 0 9768K 224K select 1 1:47 0.00% httpd
70851 ivoras 3 96 0 199M 195M CPU0 0 1:47 0.00% 7z
Load average and %CPU user are right, as are other global
statistics. The load is produced by the "7z" process
(archivers/p7zip) which compresses some data in two threads but is
credited with 0% CPU, though its runtime is correct (increments
every second as it should in a CPU-bound process). It doesn't help
if I expand / show individual threads.
Does the behaviour change if you use "top -C" or "top -P" (doubting
the latter)?
No, same in all cases.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
