On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:25:55 -0800 Jeremy Chadwick <free...@jdc.parodius.com> wrote:
> I appreciate your work on this -- truly I do -- but the above > statement is incredible. This is not meant as a flame-inducer, but > there's really no other way to phrase it: > > This IS NOT what "production-ready" means to the rest of us, > particularly those of us in the server world. A single developer > running such code on their workstation for a few months is in no way > identical to that of a heavily I/O-bound server. > > I thought freebsd.org (or maybe ISC?) offered some test/development > boxes on the 'net available to developers who could test such code + > perform stress tests over long periods of time? I'm probably > mistaken, but I was under that impression. > Luigi wrote: > i would say it is pretty solid. I used it on my main workstation > and desktop for a few months last year without a glitch. In what twilight zone does that mean 'Yes, it is production ready' to warrant such a nice diatribe? -- Alexander Kabaev
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
