On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:22 AM, <per...@pluto.rain.com> wrote: > John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> We can't e-mail announce@ every time something is going to >> be removed. That would be way too much spam for that list. > > That may depend on how often something substantial is removed :) > >> I do think stable@ is a good place to e-mail ... > > Good, perhaps even "necessary", but is it "sufficient"? Those > following a -STABLE branch are expected to read stable@, but > what about those who are following a security branch? >
If someone is following a RELENG_X (a.k.a -STABLE) or a RELENG_X_Y (a errata fix branch), then they should be reading the stable@ list. Scot _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
