On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:11:43 +0100 Ulrich Spörlein <u...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 20.01.2011 at 15:31:03 -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:17:40 +0100 > > Ulrich Spörlein <u...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Currently our buildworld relies on groff(1) and vgrind(1) being > > > present in the host system. I have a patch ready that at least > > > makes sure these are built during bootstrap-tools and completes > > > the WITHOUT_GROFF flag. > > > > > > vgrind(1) is only used for two papers under share/doc and we could > > > easily expand the results and commit them to svn directly, > > > alleviating the need to run vgrind(1) during buildworld. > > > > > > OTOH, there are much more useful tools to vgrind(1) for source > > > code formatting. So do we still have vgrind(1) users out there? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Uli > > Just to respond to initial comment, I can live without vgrind in base just fine, provided one cna be installed from ports (looks like that is true). -- Alexander Kabaev
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
