Mark Linimon <lini...@lonesome.com> writes: > On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 07:24:11PM -0700, Dave Hayes wrote: >> I see features and pkgng and things being offered up as solutions... >> these are all well and good, but in my opinion more comprehensive >> documentation and support in these areas would do more good than pkgng. > IMHO pkgng and optionsng are necessary, but not sufficient, to solve > our current problems.
Optionsng is nice, but lacking in documentation. Is it too much to ask port maintainers to write a bit more documentation on the options they are providing? -- Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - d...@jetcafe.org >>> The opinions expressed above are entirely my own <<< Sunshine proves it's own existence. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
