On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:35:35 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > Just for the record, is find that it works fine for me with gcc-4.6. > 9.1-STABLE on i386 system. Building it with the default compiler results > in a successful build, but the program would simply exit after a few > seconds with no error. The exist status was 0. No messages. When I built > with 4.6, it builds and runs fine, at least for the things I've tried. > (4.6 invoked by setting WITH_GCC.)
I confess I don't understand what all the fuss is about. LO *wants* to build with clang, clang is part of base, and LO builds and runs perfectly with clang (for me at any rate: 9.1-RELEASE on amd64). What is the issue? Is there some reason of which I am unaware, why people want to avoid using clang/llvm? _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"