On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 20:50:11 -0500 kpn...@pobox.com wrote > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 02:54:53PM -0800, Chris H wrote: > > #!/bin/sh - > > /usr/local/bin/startx -- -nolisten tcp > > > > exit > > > > which seems to get the job done, and allow me to be lazy > > at the CLI. :-) > > Personally, I'd go with: > > #!/bin/sh - > exec /usr/local/bin/startx -- -nolisten tcp > > Because then I have one fewer processes running cluttering up my ps listings, > and because the exit code from startx will now naturally be picked up by > the parent program. What if, for example, startx crashes? Your script > will hide that fact. With exec no information is lost.
Crap. Good point(s); points I should have already recognized. I'm apparently not firing on all cylinders today. Thanks, Neal, for taking the time to give me a Wake Up call! :-) > > -- > Kevin P. Neal http://www.pobox.com/~kpn/ --Chris _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
