On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 08:13:39PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > Now we can get back on the ipv6 option.
> >
> > so if we want to proceed further in removing the option to build with or
> > without
> > ipv6 for the ports side. Please speak up in reply to this email, if you are
> > building without ipv6, why are you doing so, what are the real benefit for
> > it.
> > How bad it will impact you if we do remove that option?
>
> Whenever I use ports over FreeBSD-provided packages (or to use ports to
> build my own packages), I often disable IPV6 support. The lengthy
> response below should explain why.
> {brevity snip}
This was sent to the wrong mailing list; was intended for -ports.
Sorry for the noise.
--
| Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org |
| UNIX Systems Administrator PGP 0x2A389531 |
| Making life hard for others since 1977. |
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
