I compiled my kernel with ULE this morning on my AMD64 workstation to help
test. All seems good so far. Anything in particular to keep an eye on?
-Mike
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Tuesday, 8. February 2005 14:02, Mipam wrote:
Okay clear, but the fact that it's in 5-stable suggests the it's stable to
use, else why would it be in 5-stable.
The changes that have been merged to stable have been tested for some time
in
6-CURRENT, so they're not completely experimental, yes.
Maybe i'm completly wrong in this interpretation?
I'm not sure what your interpretation is. If you go by your own definition
(what's in -stable should be safe to use), why do you ask at all? In any
case, the ULE MFC commits are only a few days old, so there's naturally not
much feedback available, good or bad. If you want to play it safe, wait a
week or a month and monitor this lists for complaints before trying it
yourself.
--
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
--------------------------------------
"Hard Work Often Pays Off After Time,
but Laziness Always Pays Off Now."
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
