On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 09:24:04PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Sat, 2005-Feb-26 19:28:29 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >I don't think there are known problems with use of PREEMPTION on > >RELENG_5. > > Thanks for that. How about RELENG_5_3? Do I need to move to > -STABLE (and traditionally, this point of the release cycle is not > a good time to be running -STABLE).
I think RELENG_5_3 is good too. I think there were some problems with PREEMPTION during the 5.3 release cycle, but they were all fixed before release. Kris
pgpa9WTU6ayNW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
