On Sat, 27 May 2006, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > If I'm not mistaken, the signedness of time_t is merely historical. > time_t predates explicitely unsigned integer data types in C. > The historical definition seems to have been "long".
Actually it was int[2] - see line 0213 of the Lions Book. Or I could get really keen and dig out my old Edition 5 manual... The C compiler didn't grok "long" in those days. -- Dave _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
