Oliver Fromme wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
3) Is timer int really generated on each cpu? Am i really wasting
cpu time on ~4000 ints per second?
4000 ints per second is rather nothing on any modern CPU.
Have a look at the top(1) display of an otherwise idle
system. The "%interrupt" column should be zero, even if
it's processing 4000 timer interrupts per second. As far
as I know, the cpu timer interrupt handler is very light-
weight.
Thank you for the answer. My convern is that with 4 CPUs i get 8000
ints/second. While em generates only about 200 ints/second. As i
undertand not all int handlers are the same. Some are heavy and some
are light on CPU. So, the question is what is better (better=less CPU
time): 8000 ints/sec from timer or 200 ints/sec from NIC?
There's no simple answer to the question. The best way is
to just try it. As I wrote, run top(1) while the system is
idle, so only the cpu timer interrupts are active. If the
"%interrupt" column is zero most of the time, then there
is nothing to worry about at all.
However, if you have a constant non-zero %interrupt value,
you might consider lowering HZ, and you might reconsider
whether polling really has advantages in your situation.
Do you have reasons to believe so? Remember that the main
purpose of polling is to improve interactivity under very
high network load. If you're not in such a situation, then
polling probably doesn't buy you much.
Well, problem with top is that on dual 3GHZ box it alsway s
shows 0% load when not loaded with real traffic (web traffic) no matter
if it is polling of int handling. And when loaded with real traffic
web server eat a lot more cpu power then traffic handling, so, no
separate measurement of traffic cpu load is possible.
But i think it is possible to simulate this kind of load, need to think about
it.
Also, when it comes to public web server i can never be secure enough and
crazy load of traffic can come any time from DDOS attack which can bring
down any box. So, for public web server it is a matter of security and
managebility to have server interactive even on high traffic load. So, even from
this poing of view polling can be usefull.
--
Regards,
Artem
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
