On 28 May 2013, at 12:54, Steve Kargl <s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:10:23PM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: >> On 28 May 2013, at 18:40, Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com> wrote: >> >>> That's not going to happen soon. While it works OK for amd64, there's still >>> many bugs in its ARM support and even more in its MIPS support. There's 0 >>> chance it will be gone in 10... >> >> I disagree. There is a significant chance that gcc in base >> will be gone for all Tier 1 platforms in 10.0. There are >> still some reasons to want gcc installed, but there are no >> compelling reasons to want an ancient version of gcc installed >> on x86[-64] or ARM. For people who need gcc, the ports >> collection provides a selection of recent versions. >> >> David > > I surely hope not! Until the individuals pushing the > change to clang actually tests clang on floating point > intensive applications, it is IMHO dubious to even have > clang as the default compiler. Just the latest example: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-numerics/2013-May/000354.html Have you, or anyone else, filed bug reports at http://llvm.org/bugs/ ? Regards, -- Rui Paulo _______________________________________________ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"