First things first,we should try remaking the installer.We are trying to better the installer,right?Why not create a new UI for the installer and make it more efficient?Perhaps better package handling routines?Just some ideas I am tossing around.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. <jer...@shidel.net> wrote: > Ok, I’m going to need some feedback on this. > > Especially things like: > > What I should strip out of the FDCONFIG.SYS and > AUTOEXEC.BAT? > > What should be included in the FDI Boot Floppy? > > How does the Installer LOGIC.txt look? > > Just about everything. > > Project URL: > http://github.com/shidel/FDI > > Current Demo Video on Facebook: > > https://www.facebook.com/jshidel/videos/o.5985782886/10207791496094518/?type=2&theater > > > > On Sep 8, 2015, at 8:16 AM, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. <jer...@shidel.net> > wrote: > > > > > > Ok, I’ve decided that I will probably build the installer, or at least a > working > > prototype that could be used for installer. > > > > Sorry, to anyone who may have been considering doing it. > > > > But, as Mercury Thirteen said: > > > > "That would probably be the most efficient solution, yes. :)” > > > > So, I started the GitHub project for it. > > > > http://github.com/shidel/FDI > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > > Freedos-devel mailing list > > Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-devel mailing list > Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
