Hallo Herr Jerome Shidel
> Also, FreeCOM and Kernel are using Unstable branches on the Interim Build.
> There have not been any commits to the unstable Kernel branch. So, it is the
> same as the master branch which is the version provided with FreeDOS 1.3.
so, the unstable kernel 1.3 is exactly the same as some previous 1.3.
> On the other hand, the unstable branch of FreeCOM contains a test version of
> the command shell which is using the same version number as the previous
> shell.
so we have some unchanged and some changed version of freecom, both by the same
number.
> It contains fixes for many bugs that were in the prior version.
what bugs specifically? *many* is a bit -ah- generic.
there used to be good old times, when there would be 2 pointers to old
('unstable') and new ('test') versions, + a list of bugs hopefully fixed,
both available without downloading and
installing 500+MB of 'distribution', which could be downloaded, expanded to a
directory of my desire, and tested.
Seriously, guys, if you think that is the new way to develop quality
software/OS,please follow Gregory ('Just go away, then 5000 Miles straight
ahead.')
> I would really like to see a new official release which contains these fixes
> and others for T2412.
> Side note… One really nice thing about having a batch file based OS
> installer, it relies heavily on the shell. The installer hammers relentlessly
> on numerous features the shell provides.
Side note: your installer tests only a very limited subset of required COMMAND
features. Testing these features multiple
times over and over doesn't make the 'test' more exhaustive.
Tom
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
