Hi Don,
no on that browser where Might I find it?  I think I looked at the freedos 
edition and it did not suit compared  to what my ssh telnet options present.
Now if I could find a wireless d-link card sigh.
I do not understand what web security has to do with Dos, or browsers that 
pose no threat.
The very nature of a low graphic environment suggests disinterest on the 
part of those who create bugs that do graphical harm.
I am too boring a user for them to care about my machine smiles.
Thanks for the suggestion,
Kare


On Mon, 18 May 2015, Don Flowers wrote:

> Karen, I also use the D-Link card (PCMCIA) in my home and it is an
> outstanding card for DOS/FreeDOS, I get the desire to maintain a pure DOS
> machine (I have one desktop and two laptops that are DOS only). Have you
> tried DIllodos (the lasted build not the one in the FreeDOS repo)? Using
> that, I can access the HTML GMAIL, I can verrry slowly browse ebay (but
> cannot buy or watch an item), I can search for DOS stuff and download it to
> my FreeDOS download folder.  FreeDOS's internet limitations are not
> necessarily on the FreeDOS end but rather on the end of the evolution of
> web security.
>
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Karen Lewellen <klewel...@shellworld.net>
> wrote:
>
>> <lifts hand from back of class>
>> But that is what I seem to be missing about freedos.
>> I run DOS only, and have no interest in having 8 different operating
>> systems on my main desktop to get the job done.
>> I have a d-link Ethernet card.  The card is very good with a ton of
>> drivers, including the one I use for dos.
>> I have a package called ssh2021b.  this package contains ssh telnet and
>> sftp  programs  as well as telnet ones for running in dos.
>> I use the program for machines higher than 386  to ssh TELNET here
>> shellworld,  into the shell I have with the host for my office dreamhost.
>> Granted, I am not using a  browser directly on my computer,  but this
>> of mouse because I cannot. it is because  no one has done a dos build of
>> Lynx
>> in a grand while.  Equally elinks needs spider monkey to have the slight
>> java  and for some reason I cannot find a recent links for dos.
>> Browsers not withstanding though, why is it so hard to just do this in
>> freedos?
>> took me ten minutes to do the setup i have for networking.
>> I may hunt the wifi card  below, if it is suitable for a laptop.
>> Sorry if this seems innocent, but what is the challenge?
>> Karen
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 18 May 2015, Mateusz Viste wrote:
>>
>>> About networking -- have you looked at the wiki article?
>>>
>>> http://www.freedos.org/wiki/index.php/Networking_FreeDOS
>>>
>>> It contains already quite a lot of informations, on many aspects of the
>>> DOS networking world.
>>>
>>> Mateusz
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 18/05/2015 10:52, Don Flowers wrote:
>>>> I have a HP Elite 8000 with 12gb RAM, I use XOSL to boot Kubuntu 14.04,
>>>> Windows 7, Compaq DOS 5.0, MS-DOS 7.10 and FreeDOS. When running Compaq
>>>> DOS and/or MS-DOS 7.10, I use the native HIMEM and Windows 3.1 runs fine
>>>> in enhanced mode; on FreeDOS even standard mode seems buggy, so it is
>>>> not necessarily a RAM issue but seems to be (IMHO) some kind of  kernel
>>>> incompatibility.
>>>>
>>>> As for Wi-Fi, I got it to work on a Compaq Armada 1750 using a Proxim
>>>> (Orinoco Gold 802.11b  PCMCIA card (using WPA), but when we switched to
>>>> Xfinity service the WPA setup was not compatible with our other wireless
>>>> devices.
>>>>
>>>> I personally would like to see an updated step-by-step how to on a wired
>>>> home network setup for FreeDOS.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:25 AM, Rugxulo <rugx...@gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:rugx...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Hi,
>>>>
>>>>     On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Guillem <guilevi2...@gmail.com
>>>>     <mailto:guilevi2...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>   >
>>>>   > I've been thinking of dualbooting my Windows PC with FreeDOS,
>>>>
>>>>     Why exactly? Although it's not a totally horrible idea, it's very
>>>>     tedious and a bit technical. Not worth risking anything important.
>> As
>>>>     I told one guy recently, make sure you backup all important files
>>>>     first, and even then, only if you have all your Windows DVD recovery
>>>>     discs (and product key) nearby.
>>>>
>>>>     What Windows do you run? WinXP? Win7? With the former, do you run it
>>>>     atop pre-existing FAT or (incompatible) NTFS? I'm not even sure you
>>>>     can (properly) resize NTFS at all before Vista (without Linux
>> GParted
>>>>     or whatever). Also, Vista on up upgraded the boot loader, so it's
>> more
>>>>     complicated to adjust, hence probably needing third-party EasyBCD.
>>>>
>>>>     Native is fun, fast, (sometimes) less buggy, and runs DOS as
>>>>     originally designed. But these days we also have great alternatives
>>>>     like DOSEMU or VirtualBox or QEMU. These emulations are much easier
>> to
>>>>     use and less error-prone, albeit no one solution is 100% perfect
>> (not
>>>>     even native). If your cpu supports VT-X, you'll probably benefit
>>>>     greatly from using that (e.g. VBox or KVM or similar) instead of raw
>>>>     booting, esp. for better accuracy and speed.
>>>>
>>>>     The simplest solution (if your PC can boot from USB) is to use RUFUS
>>>>     to make a bootable jump drive. Heck, you could also use various
>> tools
>>>>     to make a bootable Linux (presumably with DOSEMU). Even if you're
>>>>     using an old Pentium 4 (like my old one), you can still boot USB via
>>>>     PLoP Boot Manager via floppy (or CD or HD).
>>>>
>>>>   > and the only things that are preventing me from doing that right
>> now are the fact that USB serial controllers don't work all the way
>>>>
>>>>     At best, you're probably just going to have the BIOS detect a USB
>> jump
>>>>     drive as a fixed disk that can't be unplugged/removed (without
>>>>     rebooting). Bret Johnson did write some nice UHCI-only drivers, but
>> a
>>>>     lot of machines don't support that, unfortunately.
>>>>
>>>>   > and also that there's apparently no way to use applications that
>> require a sound blaster reliably. Is there any way to make some kind of
>> driver
>>>>   > that would sit between the application and the actual soundcard
>> (in my case a realtek) and forward what the app is trying to send to the
>>>>   > soundblaster to the realtek the right way?
>>>>
>>>>     Although it's not native and isn't even a real DOS (no actual
>> FreeDOS
>>>>     being used), the (portable, SDL-based) DOSBox emulator supports a
>> lot
>>>>     of graphics and soundcards, mostly for old commercial games. But
>>>>     you'll need a different host OS for it. (Linux? FreeBSD? Kolibri?)
>>>>     Believe it or not, this is better than even XP's NTVDM for many (but
>>>>     not all) games.
>>>>
>>>>   > I'm talking from a user's point of view here. I have never tried
>> developing anything for DOS so I really don't know about the limitations.
>>>>
>>>>     In native DOS? Not sure, not many have tried. Most of us aren't
>> savvy
>>>>     enough to do something so extremely technical. I mean, one guy did
>>>>     port SoftMPU (MPU-401 TSR emulator) to DOS, but even that is loosely
>>>>     based upon DOSBox!   :-)
>>>>
>>>>     Like mentioned, there really needed to be a universal API for that
>>>>     (and some did exist), but it was never popular enough for many to
>> care
>>>>     hard enough to utilize or fix it. So we have some libs, but nothing
>>>>     universally useful. Also, lots of old games are hard to find, but
>> they
>>>>     sometimes do support multiple outputs, even PC speaker. Although
>> even
>>>>     that isn't always physically available, but it's often better than
>>>>     nothing!
>>>>
>>>>   > Also would FreeDOS actually run on a PC with 8gb of RAM? That's
>> what this one has, but after the previous message in this topic I'm not so
>> sure.
>>>>
>>>>     I run it just fine on my 6 GB Lenovo desktop. Of course, due to
>> memory
>>>>     holes, I "only" get (roughly) 2.9 GB free, but even that is "too
>> much"
>>>>     for some rare software (chokes, dies). But most well-behaved apps
>>>>     (e.g. DJGPP) either work by default or can be massaged.
>>>>
>>>>     Not sure how well it will work if you're running UEFI (CSM?).
>>>>
>>>>   > I guess I would also have to figure out networking. I have no way
>> of using Ethernet because of how this house is set up.
>>>>   > I can either use Wifi or use my phone with USB tethering, which is
>> what I normally do because that PC's network card doesn't work all the way.
>>>>
>>>>     This alone is probably the biggest advantage of emulators (e.g. VBox
>>>>     or QEMU, both of which I've used lately): easy to setup networking.
>>>>     You know by default that it will work, unlike native, where you
>> can't
>>>>     be sure of anything!
>>>>
>>>>     Granted, you mentioned Windows, but it's exactly Windows that
>> doesn't
>>>>     support DOS well anymore (if at all). So while it seems crazy to
>> use a
>>>>     software-only x86 emulator atop Windows on x86, sometimes it really
>> is
>>>>     better than nothing.
>>>>
>>>>     In short: it depends on what you're trying to do, and whether you
>> can
>>>>     debug your own problems.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
>>> Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
>>> Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
>>> Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
>>> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Freedos-user mailing list
>>> Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
>> Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
>> Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
>> Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
>> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freedos-user mailing list
>> Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
>>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user

Reply via email to