If some environment REALLY needs 10,000 tps, maybe you could write some sort of replication/sync engine between LDAP and "fast users"? And of course there's always mutiple methods of load balancing.
----- Original Message ----- From: Fajar A. Nugraha [mailto:l...@fajar.net] Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2011 10:59 AM To: FreeRadius users mailing list <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org> Subject: Re: test suite simulating NAS for development? On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Alan Buxey <a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk> wrote: > for what its worth I've been chucking 10,000 users in CVS file through > radperf with no issues - not sure why yours is barfing at 7 lines.... with or without "-A"? > its only > when you rely on external services - AD/LDAP/SQL etc that things start getting > slower I know. But sometimes you're stuck with using those. So it'd be better if we can quantify the consoquences, something like "you can add users easily, but performance will drop by an order of magnitude". -- Fajar - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html <font size="1"> <div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in'> </div> "This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system." </font> - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
