On 9 Oct 2013, at 10:16, Fajar A. Nugraha <l...@fajar.net> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Alex Sharaz <alex.sha...@york.ac.uk> wrote: > While we have 900 switches doing mac and 802.1x based auth, we can have 6000+ > users on our wireless network all authenticating to RADIUS via 3 RAS clients. > Looking at the back end server log files, it does look as if, in general, > all wireless RADIUS auths head for the same back end server. > > I was wondering if there's a way off having a bit more granularity in terms > of how the f5 load balances incoming RADIUS requests. > > > Have you asked F5? > > At the very least, common load balancers (e.g. "keepalived" on linux, a > frontend for ipvs) should have the option of distributing traffic to backends > based on source IP. Since you say you have 3 RAS clients, it should work > somewhat. > You had a nose round the f5 site and subscribed to some of the communities. Shall we say that the response wasn't that great! A
> -- > Fajar > - > List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
