I just mean that the image in your paper is more wide than the image in bert tutorial. May I ask how to show ?h.sulc overlay instead of ?h.curv ? also, how to overlay the average folding pattern together with the subject folding pattern? in your paper the average pattern is shown in black line as comparison.
regards, zhang zhijun ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Fischl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 10:22 PM Subject: Re: about the average atlas in the spherical registration > I'm not sure what you mean "thin" and "thick". The figures I think show > the ?h.sulc overlay, not the ?h.curv ones (depth instead of curvature). > > Bruce > > On > Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Zhang zhijun wrote: > > > Dear Dr Fischl: > > > > I have seen in the paper "High-Resolution Intersubject Averaging and > > a Coordinate System for the > > Cortical Surface", in fig1, fig2, the subject image registered with the > > average folding pattern is much thick > > in both the sulci and the gyri, while the result in the bert tutorial is > > very thin(see freesurferguide.pdf page 48) > > Is the average folding pattern used to do the spherical registration > > different? How to make the less > > variable pattern image after registration? > > > > regards, > > zhang zhijun > > > > >
