Hi Brian,
no, the aseg should be fine. The truth is that the surfaces will probably
work as well, but the thickness estimates probably won't be terribly
good. It should be ok for functional overlay and inter-subject averaging
though.
cheers,
Bruce
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Brian C. Schweinsburg, Ph.D. wrote:
I have an older dataset with .938 x .938 x 2mm resolution but good contrast
and SNR. In previous posts, I have seen recommendations to not exceed 1.5 mm
thickness for z-plane. I was wondering if this resolution was equally
problematic for volume (aseg) labeling, similar to the surface path.
Thanks,
Brian
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
