David,

 

My apologies, but this was discussed on the development mailing list
(see below).

 

I would have used an alternative approach if I had been informed that
adding a new field to the public structure was not permitted.

 

David %^>

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Werner LEMBERG [mailto:w...@gnu.org] 
Sent: 11 December 2008 17:18
To: Bevan, David
Cc: mpsuz...@hiroshima-u.ac.jp; Ghoshal, Ronen; Tu, Houjie;
freetype-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] Accessing FSType (Type 1 or CID)?

 

 

> If I understand correctly, a field needs adding to PS_FontInfoRec

> (which is part of the public interface; presumably this is OK) and

> FSType processed just like other fields, simply by defining in

> t1tokens.h.

 

Yes, I think this should work without breaking backwards binary

compatibility of the library.  In any case, the new field should be

at the end of the structure.

 

...

 

    Werner

_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel

Reply via email to