> Does the above check aim to bound memory allocation to up to
> table->alloc_total_max? If that is the case, should the check be the
> following instead:
>
>  if ( table->bound_total                                             &&
>          table->alloc_total_max - table->alloc_current < (FT_ULong)size )
>       return NULL;

Honestly, I've never used this.  David Turner has written the code,
but he has no more time to handle FreeType issues.  It's easily
possible that you've found a bug.  Please test whether your patch is
the right one.


    Werner


_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel

Reply via email to