> So the good news is that with the 2.1.9-style sigma, > FT 2.1.10pre is much better than FT 2.1.9 for FT_Glyph_Stroke(), > and no worse than FT 2.1.9 for FT_Glyph_StrokeBorder().
David wrote me that his sigma change tried to fix a peculiar case --
he no longer has the original data, unfortunately.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Freetype mailing list
Freetype@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
