"Brian J. Murrell" wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 12:14:30PM -0500, Aubin Paul wrote:
>> 
>> I still
>> don't understand why. the CPU usage is literally double, and RAM usage
>> has gone up too.
>
> I have to agree with Aubin's opinion on RAM usage.  RAM usage is
> unreasonably high!  

The reason is that osd.py has an image cache. But each area has also
an image cache (based on how much images may be needed and they are in
the correct size). Reduce the size of the bitmap cache from 20 to 3
and you will need less RAM. 


> On my PVR, here is what "top" has to say about the
> python (freevo) process:
>
> 16410 root      15   0 67908  31M  8208 S     0.0 25.0  13:51 python
> 16411 root      15   0 67908  31M  8208 S     0.0 25.0   0:02 python
> 16412 root       0 -15 67908  31M  8208 S <   0.0 25.0   0:35 python
> 16415 root       5 -10 67908  31M  8208 S <   0.0 25.0   0:00 python
> 16416 root      10 -10 67908  31M  8208 S <   0.0 25.0   0:00 python
> 16419 root      10  -5 67908  31M  8208 S <   0.0 25.0   0:25 python
> 16420 root      10  -5 67908  31M  8208 S <   0.0 25.0   0:32 python
> 16421 root      10  -5 67908  31M  8208 S <   0.0 25.0   0:24 python
> 16423 root      15   0 67908  31M  8208 S     0.0 25.0   0:13 python
> 16426 root      15   0 67908  31M  8208 S     0.0 25.0   0:28 python
> 16430 root      15   0 67908  31M  8208 S     0.0 25.0   1:06 python
> 16431 root      15   0 67908  31M  8208 S     0.0 25.0   1:52 python

After setting the cachesize to 3 I have

SIZE=50900 and RSS=49MB when viewing images and 
SIZE=34128, RSS=33MB when not. 

When I make dischi1 the default skin I will change the cachesize to 3
or disable it and add an extra cache to the image viewer.

> (I realize that these are all threads of the same process and the
> total VM usage is 67908, not 67908 x 12, but even still...)

70 MB is too much, I agree. But you may have a higher RAM usage if you
use the runtime. 

> 68MB of VM and 31MB of resident RAM usage is just way too high for
> what we have here.  And I still find the latency of IR key presses to
> be bad.  It is in a state where I am using freevo now, but I am still
> annoyed at the result of pressing and holding the down key (for
> instance) in the Recorded TV Programs menu.  The cursor keeps moving
> way beyond my releasing the key.

Have you tried yesterdays version? I also will add surface lock/unlock
later today to make it faster.


Dischi

-- 
Last night I dreamed I ate a ten-pound marshmallow, and when I woke up
the pillow was gone.
                -- Tommy Cooper


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: 
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! 
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Freevo-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel

Reply via email to