On 06/09/2017 09:41 AM, Nick Thompson wrote: > It seems like onions develop from the inside out, right?
Heh, I don't know. Nor do I care because my analogy is not intended to be anything more than an analogy. >8^D >The outside layer is just the first inside layer grown large. I think if one >examines the whole onion plant, one finds that each layer of the onion proper >is connected to its own onion leave. But mostly my interest is in playing the >metaphor game rigorously, which you are doing with admirable precision. There our purposes diverge. My interest is in demonstrating that the concept of levels is inadequate to describe the layers involved in complexity. > I stipulate that a bump in one layer of an onion will enforce itself on the > layers around it, so the layers are not entirely independent of one another. > Do you stipulate that each layer of an onion is essentially an independent > plant wrapped in the earlier layers grown larger? Not in the slightest. I only stipulate that the concept of levels is inadequate when examining onions. > At some point, in the metaphor game, we return to the thing we are trying to > explain and map the elements of the metaphor (the "analogs") onto the > explanandum. But not yet. This is too much fun. Unfortunately, perhaps because I simulate things for a living, I don and doff analogs more frequently than you don and doff hats or shoes. So, I'm ready to abandon the near-spherical onion and move on to more complicated surfaces and the layers that accrete from within or without. -- ☣ glen ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
