On 01/29/2017 01:41 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
Well, e.g. Todd-Coxeter is pretty much domain-specific; one could also
choose to interface a stand-alone coset enumeration routine
like ACE (see http://staff.itee.uq.edu.au/havas/
and https://gap-packages.github.io/ace/). Producing toy implementations
of coset enumeration is of course fun, but is limited to (self)teaching
purposes---I'm saying this as someone who uses coset enumeration in
research quite a bit.
Hi Dima,
I'm sure the approach of gluing together mature implementations is very
powerful but if I wanted to work that way I think I would work with SAGE.
I like the approach of having implementations richly interconnected and
written in a common language (SPAD) which is designed for mathematics
and is statically typed.
I guess its good that both approaches exist and we can choose what is
best for each application.
I also think it is good to introduce what you may consider toy
implementations. I assume most mature implementations must have started
small. If we took the above approach to its most extreme then would
anything ever be added to FriCAS?
Martin B
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS -
computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to fricas-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
