On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:53:56PM -0500, Steven M. Christey wrote: > According to the definitions proposed by Brian Martin of OSVDB, CVE is in > fact a database - HOWEVER it is a highly specialized one intended for > correlation and comparison across multiple tools and products. That said, > 90% of its consumers do not use it for that reason. The FAQ should > probably be rephrased a bit. >
hahahahahaha, "a responsibility rfc government funded expert" wrote. http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003-August/008386.html >>So you are collecting 0days for free, put them in a lame database and >>whine more than a script kiddie this is a hard job? >I don't view it that way. > >1) CVE is not a vulnerability database, per the FAQ on the CVE web > site at http://cve.mitre.org/about/faq.html#A7 (though we are not > blind to the fact that some people try to use it as a database > anyways). -- where do you want bill gates to go today? junk: _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
