On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Thor (Hammer of God) <t...@hammerofgod.com> wrote: > I am constantly amazed at posts like this where you make yourself sound like > some sort of statistical genius because you were "able to predict" that since > last year was %243, that this year would be %243. Wow. Really?
I agree that the post is a bit pompous...however: > And for the record, these claims of 'inherent insecurity' in Windows are > simply ignorant. If you are still running Windows 95 that's your problem. > Do a little research before post assertions based on 10 or 20 year old issues. > This smacks of the classic troll, where you say things like "nothing that > Microsoft makes is secure and it never will be" But...it is true that nothing Microsoft (or anyone, perhaps) makes is secure. And given that Microsoft has a decades long history of far worse than industry average security I think it is pretty reasonable to surmise that Windows will never be secure. > and then go on to say how easy it is to migrate, and how it's free, with only > a one off cost, and how to move off of .NET. We migrated. With only a one off cost. Been a few years now. Business is looking good. > Obvious "predictions," ignorant assumptions, and a total lack of any true > understanding of business computing. Yep, "troll." Trollish but not entirely wrong. BMF _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
