On Jan 27, 2012 4:07 PM, <valdis.kletni...@vt.edu> wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:06:28 GMT, Michael Schmidt said: > > You want to be very careful with that line of thought. You are taking the > > creator the rightful owners profits, which they are entitled to if it is a > > product they created to be sold. > > You might want to go read "Courtney Love Does The Math", and then ask yourself > the following: > > 1) You can make a case that if you copy an album intead of buying it, you're > depriving somebody of profits. But what if it's an album that you would *not* > have bought at full price anyhow? Or one that you bought used (see "first sale > principle")?
If you buy an album used, the seller generally loses possession of it, you gain possession of it at a reduced cost, and the original purchase still gave the original seller and producer value. Value has still been exchanged, assuming no literal theft was involved to make the whole thing criminal anyway. If you make a copy, you're pretty much creating (or, if you prefer, *re*-creating) value out of basically nothing using source material, but nothing of value goes back to the original creator of what was copied. Besides that, I do not trust customers to make their own price up for everything they buy because (a) they may be honest but not know how to properly appraise a piece of work or (b) they will try to shaft you. It's literally like blindly trusting user input. Before you bring up Humble, Radiohead, et al: just because it can and has been done a few times doesn't mean it's viable or as lucrative as it should be. (Humble even STILL had pirates, IIRC!) > > 2) Who gets those profits, the artist, the label, or the RIAA? Are you > stealing profits from the artist, or are you stealing them from somebody else > who was attemting to steal them from the artist? All of the above; while the companies' creative accounting is almost criminally bullshit, the artist *still* gets a cut and even a profit if they do well enough. As a nasty little bonus, any profit taken from those companies will never, ever be seen by the artist regardless. There is a 100% better chance of an artist receiving money via a record company getting paid for the artist's work than a record company *not* getting paid from the artist's work. It's gotta come from somewhere. So if you're screwing them and they're screwing the artist, you just wind up making them screw the artist that much harder. > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/