Re: CFMODULE vs CFINCLUDE

[Mike]

I am still a little confused as to what is a higher level and low-level function.   BTW your Portal is a great learning tool! ----- Original Message ----- From: Lee Borkman To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2002 6:44 PM Subject: Re: CFMODULE vs CFINCLUDE Hi Mike,   Generally in Fusebox, we have a distinction between low-level, private, atomic functions (called Fuses) and higher-level, public functions (called FuseActions).    We use <cfinclude> to call the low-level Fuses, and <cfmodule> to call entire high-level FuseActions.   (There is also a new, quasi-proprietary, extension to the FB3 framework, called FuseQ, that's getting a fair bit of discussion at the moment.  It provides an alternative method for invoking entire FuseActions.  Watch this space to see if it becomes standardised.)   Does that make sense?   Thanks, LeeBB ----- Original Message ----- From: Mike   Hello All,   I was looking at some example fusebox apps and was looking at Lee's Portal example.  Can someone let me know why Lee uses CFMODULE to include the template instead of CFINCLUDE.  I noticed this in out_portal.cfm is there a benefit to using one over the other?   Thank you   Mike ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bWbH7I Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================ ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: archive@jab.org EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================